Lto 5 backup software mac

Canister comes with a simple installer which allows you to install the set of drivers you need. Not sure which one?

Just open Canister, and it will tell you which drivers are missing. We also made it easy to swap drivers. Keep the installer at hand, and select a new set. Installing those will clean up the existing drivers first so you can be sure your system is set up as it should. As LTO has to work across a wide span of operating systems, file systems, and of course languages, it has a strict set of illegal characters.


One way to get around that is to rename files and keep track of what has been renamed into what with a database. That means that to correctly retrieve media without relinking issues in your NLE, you require a database. Now fast forward to ten years from now, and your LTO software might be way beyond its end of life.

With a potential shelf life of 30 years for your tapes, who knows what computing looks like by then? Can you imagine having to support a database from the early 80s, today? So, preferably no database. Besides that, working around illegal characters is done all the time without needing a database, and you even know how: Canister utilizes URL encoding for all illegal characters, renaming files on the way to tape, and reversing the process when retrieving from tape. When writing data to a hard disk, its partition table, the index of what goes where, is updated on the fly. Not something you ever think about.

Again, tape behaves very differently. As said before, LTFS divides a tape into two partitions: After writing data to tape, the index has to be updated. There are three options: Updating the index for each file is a terrible idea when using frame-based codecs or backing up complete projects with tiny files inside. Indexing every so X minutes is much better, but will interrupt large transfers leading to shoeshining. Worse, the last bit of data written to tape is potentially not indexed if you shut down the tape machine too soon. Index on unmount indexes when, well, unmounting.

The ideal situation would be a mix of all three depending on file size, time or GBs transferred since the last index, and to always finish up when ejecting. Alas, only one can be chosen. Creating the index on unmount is the only foolproof mechanism to make sure what has been written to tape is safe and sound. We think Canister will make your LTO life far easier. But there is always a need for more features, for more workflows. Which feature do you think we should build first? Get it at hedge. If you have any questions, please let us know through canister hedge.

Sign in Get started. Sep 17, Never miss a story from Hedge - backup software for filmmakers , when you sign up for Medium. Tim Gerhard Magnext x tgerhard magnext. I'm just perusing some of the options now BRU looks interesting - reading the white paper am I correct to assume that file integrity is it's main advantage over LTFS, ie avoiding bitrot and that it is an off the shelf solution for this? I don't think i'll be using it tomorrow but i'll be bookmarking it for future consideration. This too looks useful, but does it do anything like file integrity handling like BRU does or is that considered not it's purpose?

Meant to last long enough until I can upgrade to better solutions for older projects like those i'm trying to insure don't experience any more bit rot. If a solution costs so much I can't afford it until after "another hard drive crashes" it does me no good - so it's more about understanding what I can do now, and what I should ideally do later, and not painting myself into the corner with the first solution somehow because the original solution at least works properly - even if it is not the most convenient, ideally time saving, or similar.

Ie the minor hassle of "breaking projects into 2. Another issue is interacting with outside parties. Mailing people an LTO tape using LTFS is something I can often expect people on the other side to handle, they may or may not have the same backup software I do and i'm not necessarily going to buy it for them.

Lto 5 backup software mac

Basically it sounds like the two main differences between 'free' backup software and 'real' backup software is either data integrity OR easier librarian duties managing old versions and offline media archives, and the software either does one or the other. Responding to things out of order. I'm still in college, much of what I do is on a shoestring. There is not enough side paying work to justify the level of investment most other people are making in their projects - a few hundred dollars is still alot of money.

My main observation is that LTFS seems to almost do a better job for free by maintaining cross platform compatibility and near line access to files that i'm trying to understand why I would want to lock away files in a proprietary format? If I were a production house clearing a third of a petabyte per year in offline media archives that seems like a completely different use case. As to technical support on HP's software I don't know anything about it, I was just planning on using straight LTFS which is already more reliable than the straight mirroring to USB backup drives i've been doing for years because i've had bit rot and file corruption sometimes occur.

The main advantage I would see in backup systems designed for petabyte level storage is probably keeping track of easy to lose files but I already have a system for that which I use with external USB drives. Most answers I can see coming from a backup company I would imagine to involve "well if it didn't work then your tape was corrupt" and other than straight three way mirroring keeping one offsite, like I assume they aren't going to be able to do much for me anyways. The tape is going to read in the hardware - or it's not. If that data is further locked away in some proprietary format - that helps me even less than if I can boot it onto any system.

If you help me with this for free, I will pay time for time for something else I know about. Asking for best practices advice is not the same as volunteering hundreds of hours for an editing project. Hi Rachael - OMG! I know that you feel that I am attacking you with my response, and I fully appreciate that you are a very VERY ambitious student more than most professionals I know - but I have to respond.

It works seamlessly with P5 Synchronize and Archive, allowing broad data availability options.

You do not need LTO for your project. It is fantastic that you want to learn about LTO, and that you are becoming aware of the different types of LTO archive solutions on the market. But this is not your financial responsibility, and no offense, but your school project is not that critical that it requires LTO archive. The school can certainly afford it. It's not your responsibility. I think it's great that you want to do this, and are interested in learning this, as when you get out, your real job as an assistant editor will involve boring things that include transcoding, exporting, and archiving projects.

Your LTO knowledge will be very valuable for you. While you have no money, your PARENTS that are funding you for an education whose degree will mean nothing in the real world, would be better suited to purchase real LTO software for you, instead of paying for school. Everyone is a film maker.

  • download counter strike for mac os x.
  • aprire file rar con mac gratis!
  • YoYottaID Mac OSX Backup Software (No LTO/LTFS Support)!
  • mac miller asher roth type beat;
  • PreRoll Post for Mac - Archive LTO Tapes with LTFS software - Imagine Products!

Not everyone knows the knowledge that you appear anxious to learn. That knowledge will give you the opportunity to "get in" and move forward with your career - not your creative film making class. It will leave you with heartache and frustration.

Canister – Hedge - backup software for filmmakers

Besides - who is going to get you the LTO drive, which costs thousands of dollars, even if you had the software for free? Just my stupid 2 cents. I have to totally agree with Bob. In interfacing with the big studios and post houses, what you know about the technology and how to best utilize it weigh far more into landing a job in a real situation you know, one that can pay the bills and is far more important than an indie short and years of film school - which is only going to get you an AD position or possibly an ADP position - mostly at the intern level.

However, KNOWING about mezzanine formats, media management, encoding and transcoding, and storage and archival will land you a serious position with almost any of them. Not everyone can be a director or DP. Most productions only need 1 of each. However, every production needs people that understand storage technologies and the manner in which the various platforms, filesystems, and devices work together.

Spending your money on an LTO solution and some storage so that you can learn about storage formats, filesystem pros and cons, media management, and archival needs is a much more productive - and far less expensive - school of hard knocks than spending 5x that cost on schooling that is more often out of date other than the basics by the time that you graduate.

To further restate Bob's comments on free software - LTFS is free, but it comes with the support and assistance that you get with anything free - if you break it, you get to keep the parts. And, if it doesn't work, you're at the mercy of your peers since the LTFS suite is released as Open Source and contains the caveat in the license that: I had like to share my experience on free conventional software vs a paid tool.

I had issues with Time Machine especially with the email backups. I receive roughly mails every day and my my Mailbox would fill up every other month. I use POP since then, thus making emails more of system dependent. But the retrieval was damn complicated and time taking. Later I used Mail Backup X. This is a paid tool. The 15 day free trial went pretty well. Mail Backup X offers Mirror Backup option, that enables me to keep a copy of backup automatically to Ext.